Back to the blog
Practical guides
Jaume Fontal
CPTO & Co-Founder
Corporate environmental management is no longer a secondary function within sustainability departments.
Today, regulatory compliance, investor pressure, and growing transparency demands require companies to measure, analyze, and report their environmental impacts with precision. This need has driven the adoption of specialized software capable of automating calculations, centralizing evidence, and generating audit-ready reports aligned with standards such as ISO 14001, ISO 14064, ISO 14046, the GHG Protocol, PEF, and regulatory frameworks like the CSRD.
In this article, we compare the best environmental management software currently available, with Manglai at the top of the list due to its usability, technical alignment with leading international standards, and its comprehensive approach: carbon footprint, water, waste, energy, environmental risk, and regulatory reporting.
Environmental management software is a platform that centralizes all processes, data, and evidence required to measure, control, and improve an organization’s environmental performance. Its primary purpose is to ensure that information is reliable, auditable, and comparable, enabling teams to make data-driven decisions and comply with standards such as ISO 14001, ISO 14064, ISO 14046, PEF, or CSRD requirements.
To be truly effective, modern environmental software must integrate all key dimensions of environmental management into a single environment:
Selecting the right environmental software is a strategic decision: it determines the level of maturity, traceability, and efficiency the organization can achieve in the coming years.
These are the core criteria any environmental management tool should meet:
The system must align with leading international standards to ensure reliable, auditable calculations:
System robustness depends on its ability to record data sources, calculations, emission factors, evidence, and changes. Environmental data only has value if it is reproducible, verifiable, and fully traceable.
Effective software must connect to real data sources: APIs, ERPs, IoT sensors, meters, production sheets, and internal management systems. Integration reduces manual errors and improves data consistency across the organization.
The platform must support growth from a single site to an entire corporation without redesign. Scalable software supports multiple sites, roles, permissions, and module expansion without friction.
If the system is not intuitive, it will not be used. Usability is critical: clear processes, agile data entry, understandable dashboards, and workflows designed for non-technical teams. Failed implementations are almost always due to operational friction.
Investment should be evaluated based on total cost of ownership: licenses, implementation, customization, maintenance, and support. The optimal choice is the one that reduces internal workload and ensures long-term operational continuity.
There is no single tool that fits all organizations, as each company starts from a different maturity level and must address different environmental areas: carbon footprint, water, waste, energy, regulatory compliance, or CSRD reporting. However, it is possible to identify solutions that stand out for methodological rigor, integration capacity, and data traceability.
In this comparison, we analyze the software solutions that best meet today’s environmental management requirements and explain which type of organization benefits most from each, placing Manglai at the top of the list for its integrated approach and its ability to unify all environmental management processes within a single auditable system.
Manglai is the ideal option for environmental and sustainability teams that need to centralize ISO 14001, carbon footprinting, water footprinting, and waste management in a single system with full data traceability. Its value proposition lies in integrating environmental indicators, evidence, permits, and risks into one unified workflow, enabling a complete operational and strategic view.

Key strengths include:

From an operational perspective, the interface is intuitive and easy to adopt even for non-technical users. As a recommendation, organizations should validate the module roadmap according to their environmental maturity to maximize implementation impact.
Best for: organizations with technical teams, industrial plants, and advanced modeling needs.
Strengths:
Consideration: configuration and operation require expert profiles; high cost and long implementation timelines.
Best for: corporations seeking an integrated EHS + compliance + ESG system.
Strengths:
Consideration: one of the most powerful—but also most expensive and complex—systems.
Best for: industrial teams looking to combine safety, quality, and environment in a single platform.
Strengths:
Consideration: while it covers sustainability, it is not specialized in deep LCA or advanced footprinting.
Best for: organizations requiring a flexible system for audits, permits, risks, and document management.
Strengths:
Consideration: customization requires time and consulting support.
Best for: companies seeking complex ESG governance with high levels of customization.
Strengths:
Consideration: long deployment timelines and high cost.
Best for: real estate portfolios that need standardized data and reporting to GRESB and similar frameworks.
Strengths:
Consideration: not a transversal environmental management system; focused on real estate.
If an organization wants to increase its environmental maturity in under six months, these steps apply to all projects:
Environmental management is evolving toward a model based on data, traceability, and continuous reporting. Companies that adopt digital solutions today will be better prepared to meet the regulatory demands of 2025–2030 and demonstrate genuine environmental leadership.
Among all available options, Manglai stands out for offering an integrated, auditable, and accessible approach for teams that need fast results without sacrificing technical rigor.
If your organization wants to move toward more efficient, precise, and audited environmental management, request a Manglai demo and discover how to consolidate all your environmental management processes into a single traceable system.
Not necessarily. Software reduces 50–70% of the time spent consolidating and reporting data, but consulting remains relevant for strategy, advanced analysis, and verification.
No, but audits show that companies using digital systems reduce findings by 35% thanks to better traceability and document control.
Yes. Platforms like Manglai enable an integrated view of environmental performance, which is essential for CSRD compliance.
Yes. Excel does not track emission factors, changes, evidence, or approval workflows. For complex environmental audits, data must be fully traceable.
Jaume Fontal
CPTO & Co-Founder
About the author
Jaume Fontal is a technology professional who currently serves as CPTO (Chief Product and Technology Officer) at Manglai, a company he co-founded in 2023. Before embarking on this project, he gained experience as Director of Technology and Product at Colvin and worked for over a decade at Softonic. At Manglai, he develops artificial intelligence-based solutions to help companies measure and reduce their carbon footprint.
Companies that trust us

We compare the best software solutions for implementing ISO 14064. Key advantages, selection criteria, with Manglai leading the list.
07 January, 2026
We compare the best ESG software solutions to manage ESG and report under CSRD. Different options with Manglai leading the list.
05 January, 2026
We compare the best software solutions for obtaining MITECO certification. Accuracy, traceability, and why Manglai leads the ranking.
29 December, 2025
Guiding businesses towards net-zero emissions through AI-driven solutions.
© 2026 Manglai. All rights reserved
Política de Privacidad