Best Software for SQAS Sustainability Reporting

The SQAS certification (Safety & Quality Assessment for Sustainability) has become one of the most relevant assessment systems for logistics operators, chemical companies, transport providers, and industrial service suppliers that must demonstrate strong performance in safety, quality, and sustainability.

In recent years, the SQAS framework has evolved from a system focused mainly on operational processes into a model that integrates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) indicators, introducing new requirements for transparency and documented evidence.

At the same time, regulatory pressure and growing client expectations, especially in sectors such as chemicals, logistics, and distribution, have significantly increased the need for digital tools capable of producing complete, auditable, and consistent SQAS reports. Achieving this with spreadsheets is practically impossible: traceability is lost, information is duplicated, and the risk of methodological errors increases.

In this article, we analyze the best software solutions for SQAS sustainability reporting, with a specific focus on tools that automate reporting, facilitate audits, and ensure data consistency across the different assessment modules. We also explain why Manglai leads the ranking thanks to its methodological approach, its alignment with international standards, and its ability to deliver structured, verifiable, and audit-ready reporting.

What is the SQAS Assessment and why does it require specialized software?

The SQAS methodology was developed by CEFIC to assess logistics providers and industrial operators based on safety, quality, and sustainability criteria.

Although it is not a certification in the strict sense, it functions as an internationally recognized assessment system in which an external auditor reviews risk management, operational safety, accident prevention, environmental management, climate and energy indicators, governance and responsible practices, regulatory compliance, and documentary evidence and traceability.

Over the past five years, SQAS has incorporated stricter environmental metrics, including:

• Energy consumption indicators
• Greenhouse gas emissions (including methodologies aligned with the GLEC Framework)
• Waste management
• Water footprint
• Performance evaluation across logistics routes and processes

As a result, the requirements for environmental reporting are increasingly demanding, and audits require verifiable documentation, structured data, and full traceability for every indicator.

If you want to explore how to communicate these results effectively, you can read our article: How to communicate your decarbonization strategy and avoid greenwashing.

How to choose the best SQAS-compatible software

Selecting the right software to meet SQAS requirements is a strategic decision that directly affects the quality of the final report, the ease of passing the audit, and the ability to demonstrate real sustainable performance.

Not all tools on the market are prepared to handle the documentary complexity, environmental indicators, and traceability required by the SQAS framework. Comparing functionalities, regulatory alignment, and reporting capabilities is therefore essential to avoid errors and ensure consistent results.

These are the six essential requirements that SQAS-compatible software must meet:

1. Methodological structure aligned with SQAS: SQAS questionnaires require clear evidence, specific indicators, and a very precise organization of information. The software must allow each assessment section to be mapped to verifiable data, documents, and metrics.

2. Automated reporting and auditability: The platform must generate reports that allow auditors to verify data seamlessly, including energy and environmental indicators, documented evidence, performance records, as well as version control and change history.

3. Integration with environmental calculation tools: The updated SQAS approach requires climate metrics. Therefore, the software must be able to calculate corporate carbon footprint (GHG Protocol), logistics emissions (GLEC Framework), and ESRS indicators for companies subject to CSRD.

4. Scalability and adaptability to different SQAS modules: The tool must work across transport, warehousing, tank cleaning, distribution, and logistics service providers.

5. Document management capabilities: SQAS requires organizational, operational, and environmental evidence. A robust system must allow documents to be uploaded, versioned, linked to specific criteria, and shared with auditors.

6. Audit-ready dashboards and indicators: Auditors particularly value clean indicators, time series, traceability by logistics site, and clear methodological explanations.

Which is the best software for SQAS Sustainability Reporting?

Choosing the best software to prepare SQAS sustainability reports is critical to ensuring a smooth, well-documented evaluation process aligned with CEFIC requirements.

The complexity of the SQAS framework, which combines safety, quality, environmental management, and logistics performance, requires tools capable of centralizing evidence, generating reliable environmental indicators, and providing full traceability for external audits. In a market full of partial solutions, identifying a platform truly adapted to SQAS requirements is essential.

Below, we analyze the best SQAS-compatible software solutions, with Manglai positioned as the most complete and efficient option for logistics operators, chemical companies, and service providers seeking accurate, consistent, and easily verifiable reports.

1. Manglai: The most comprehensive solution for SQAS Reporting

Manglai is designed for logistics companies, transport operators, chemical industries, and service providers that need to manage all SQAS assessment requirements in an integrated way.

The platform combines environmental calculations (carbon footprint, waste, water, and energy) with structured reporting modules aligned with SQAS criteria, enabling the generation of complete, coherent, and verifiable reports without data duplication.

‍

‍

‍

‍

In addition, Manglai enables:

• Direct integration with methodologies such as the GLEC Framework and the GHG Protocol.
• Automatic generation of environmental reports compatible with CSRD, ISO 14064, and ISO 14067.
• Comparable dashboards by logistics site, route, fleet, or supplier.
• Advanced multi-criteria reporting modules for chemical operations and international transport.
• Reduction simulations to demonstrate continuous improvement, a key requirement within SQAS.

If you are interested in logistics emissions measurement, you can also read our article: Implementing the GLEC Framework in logistics: emissions calculation and fleet optimization.

Ideal for large corporations with a SAP ecosystem. Its main strength lies in integration with ERP systems, fleets, warehouses, and production processes. Although it is not specifically designed for SQAS, it allows indicators to be mapped and safety and sustainability modules to be integrated.

Other strengths include deep integration with corporate systems.

2. Sphera Sustainability Suite

An advanced software solution for industrial sustainability management. It stands out for its methodological rigor and its ability to cover safety, risk, and environmental requirements within a single environment.

Strengths: high technical depth and robust reference data.‍

Points to consider: designed for expert users and typically requires a long implementation process.

3. One Click LCA

Well known for its focus on life cycle assessment (LCA) and the construction sector, but it also offers modules for corporate environmental indicators. It can be used as partial support for certain SQAS requirements.

Strengths: environmental templates and automation.‍

Points to consider: not designed to cover SQAS requirements in full.

4. Ecochain

A lightweight platform for SMEs that need to measure environmental impacts. It is suitable for companies looking to complement the environmental component of SQAS.

Strengths: ease of use and simplified LCA.‍

Points to consider: limited capabilities for complex audits.

5. Enablon (Wolters Kluwer)

One of the leading global suites for risk management, quality, and EHS. It can be adapted to SQAS assessments through configurable modules.

Strengths: robustness and scalability.‍

Points to consider: complex implementation and high costs.

6. VelocityEHS

A global leader in EHS solutions. It can support SQAS modules related to safety, risk management, and environmental performance.

Strengths: strong capabilities in safety and operational risk management.‍

Points to consider: less focused on European regulatory requirements.

7. openLCA

Open-source software focused on technical environmental analysis. It does not natively cover SQAS requirements but can be used to generate part of the required environmental indicators.

Strengths: flexible and cost-effective.‍

Points to consider: requires a high level of technical expertise and configuration.

How to start creating SQAS Reports

Starting the preparation of an SQAS report requires a structured and methodical approach to ensure data consistency, high-quality documentation, and full traceability of every piece of evidence.

While many companies begin by gathering information without a defined structure, the SQAS model requires environmental indicators, operational processes, and safety records to be prepared according to a very specific framework.

Having a clear methodology from the outset, and ideally using software that automates part of the process, reduces errors, saves time, and significantly facilitates the external audit.

Below are the essential steps to start creating SQAS reports efficiently and without friction:

1. Identify the applicable SQAS module (transport, storage, distribution, or others) and define the purpose of the report: This step determines which environmental and operational indicators are required, as well as the scope of documentary evidence. Internal processes are then analyzed to identify what information is already available and what must be created or updated to meet auditor requirements.

2. Collect operational, environmental, and documentary management data: At this stage, it is particularly useful to centralize energy consumption, GHG emissions, internal procedures, safety records, and previous audits. Specialized software such as Manglai can drastically reduce the time required for this phase by automating evidence organization and facilitating environmental indicator calculations.

3. Prepare the SQAS report: This involves structuring each piece of evidence according to the relevant criterion and generating clear, comparable indicators. Advanced platforms enable automatic report generation and dashboards that support pre-audit reviews.

4. Conduct an internal pre-audit to review traceability, documentation, and version control: The final phase includes sharing the report with the auditor and preparing for the evaluation session—a process that becomes significantly faster if the software has already generated a clean, structured, and verifiable report.

Technology and rigor for SQAS Sustainability Reporting

SQAS sustainability reports have become a key tool for demonstrating environmental performance, operational safety, and responsible management in sectors where regulatory pressure and customer expectations continue to rise.

After analyzing the leading solutions on the market, Manglai stands out as the most comprehensive platform, capable of combining advanced environmental calculations, document management, audited reporting, and end-to-end traceability within a single system.

In an environment where digitalization is essential to remain competitive, having a robust, scalable, and audit-oriented software solution is a decisive advantage for achieving a solid and transparent SQAS assessment.

If you want to move toward precise and transparent measurement in line with the SQAS methodology, request a Manglai demo and discover how to generate SQAS sustainability reports with full confidence.

FAQs about the best software for SQAS Sustainability Reporting

Is software mandatory for SQAS reporting?

No, it is not mandatory, but it is highly recommended. Digitalization can reduce errors and speed up the audit process by up to 70%.

Can spreadsheets be used for SQAS?

Yes, but they are inefficient due to the lack of traceability, change control, and documentary consistency.

Does SQAS reporting include carbon metrics?

Yes, especially in logistics modules, as climate-related requirements continue to increase every year.

What differentiates SQAS software from generic sustainability software?

The ability to structure evidence according to the SQAS framework and generate audit-ready reports by module.