The WDI quantifies what share of a territory’s, sector’s or organisation’s total water footprint is satisfied with imported virtual water—that is, the water embedded in goods and services produced in other basins or countries. A high WDI indicates significant exposure to climatic, regulatory, or geopolitical events occurring outside domestic borders.
Formula and interpretation ranges
WDI (%) = (Imported virtual water / Total water footprint) × 100
- 0–20%: Low dependency
- 21–50%: Moderate dependency
- >50%: High dependency and potential risk
Components of imported water
- Crops and food products: soy, wheat, rice, coffee
- Textile fibres: cotton, viscose
- Minerals and metals: lithium, cobalt, bauxite used in batteries and electronics
- Manufactured products: clothing, smartphones, automobiles
Examples of national WDIs (2024)
- Japan → 78%: depends heavily on cereal imports and livestock fed with Brazilian soy
- Italy → 62%: high consumption of coffee and cocoa; limited domestic water availability in the south
- Brazil → 18%: net exporter of virtual water (grains, meat)
- United Arab Emirates → 92%: almost all food-related water footprint is external
Calculation methodology
- Inventory of imported goods (customs data, COMTRADE)
- Assignment of virtual-water coefficients (WaterStat, FAO AquaCrop)
- Calculation of imported blue, green, and grey water
- Summation of domestic water footprint (internal production)
- Application of the WDI formula
Strategic implications
- Food security: a WDI > 60% signals strong vulnerability to droughts or export restrictions in supplier countries
- Displaced environmental footprint: ecological impacts occur far from consumers; reputational risk increases
- Trade and tariff policy: potential introduction of water-related border adjustments (Water CBAM) for water-intensive products
How to reduce the WDI
- Diversify sourcing, avoiding concentration in high-stress basins (AWARE > 20)
- Boost efficient domestic production via precision irrigation and drought-tolerant crops
- Substitute high-water-use products: almond milk → local oat milk
- Resilient procurement contracts with suppliers certified in water stewardship (AWS)
- Cooperation programmes: invest in water efficiency in partner countries to stabilise supply
Integration into corporate ESG reporting
- Report the WDI under water-risk disclosures in CDP Water
- Link WDI-reduction goals with corporate water-neutrality strategies
- Publish annual improvements and mitigation actions in CSRD reports
Limitations and challenges
- Data quality: virtual-water coefficients vary by local farming practices and require periodic updates
- Time lag: annual customs data may hide short-term shocks
- Partial service coverage: virtual water in digital services or tourism is difficult to quantify
Relationship with other indicators
- Footprint Displacement Index (FDI): broadens the scope to other environmental footprints
- Water security: a high WDI reduces national water security
- Water vulnerability: external dependency increases exposure to events beyond domestic control
The Water Dependency Index reveals how consumption is interconnected with distant water resources. A WDI > 50% raises significant challenges for water security and extended environmental responsibility; reducing it through diversification, efficiency, and cooperation is essential to building resilience in a changing climate.